Winston Churchill, Islamic World, Middle East, Turks, Gallipoli and Atatürk - An Exclusive Interview with Cambridge University Historian Dr. Warren Dockter ( Tuncay Yılmazer )

Tarih: 18/02/2015   /   Toplam Yorum 3   / Yazar Adı:      /   Okunma 8918

There is no doubt that British Statesman Winston Churchill was one of the most influential leader in the 20th Century. In his 50th death anniversary , we present an exclusive interview with Dr. Warren Dockter. How Islam affected Winston Churchill’s  thoughts? Was Churchill's tendency to İslamic culture used by his political rivals against him ? As the world entered the war, did he consider to open war against Ottoman Empire?  What was his opinion about Turks and especially Mustafa Kemal Atatürk? What was the importance of Gallipoli Campaign in his career?

Dr. Warren Dockter is a research fellow in Cambridge University. His first monograph, Winston Churchill and the Islamic World: Orientalism, Empire and Diplomacy in the Middle East, places Churchill in the context of colonial discourse and reveals the extent to which orientalism influenced his opinions and policies regarding the Islamic world.  


Warren Dockter is a graduate of the University of Tennessee and gained his PhD at the University of Nottingham in July 2012. He has taught at the University of Exeter and the University of  Worcester and was an Archives By-Fellow at Churchill College. His research interest lies in British Imperialism in the Middle East during the late nineteenth and twentieth century, encapsulating orientalism and trans-national historical approaches. His first monograph, Winston Churchill and the Islamic World: Orientalism, Empire and Diplomacy in the Middle East, places Churchill in the context of colonial discourse and reveals the extent to which orientalism influenced his opinions and policies regarding the Islamic world.


Hello Warren Dockter. Thank you for accepting our interview offer. We are going to talk about famous British statesman Winston Churchill and his views on Islamic World particularly Turkey.


You are a researcher on Winston Churchill and especially his approaching Islamic World and Middle East. Firstly, could you describe his character?

Winston Churchill is one of the most iconic and dynamic figures of the 20th century.  He was a larger than life character whose career became inexorably linked to the Middle East, especially when he was Colonial Secretary in the early 1920s. 



One of the interesting thing That I learned your web site is Churchill  tried to fight for the Ottoman Empire in the Greco -Turkish war of 1897. He met with Ian Hamilton ( Future General of the BEF )  who wanted to join this war on the Greek side! Could you eloborate this?

Churchill was just looking for action and glory which he often did as a young man.  Initially, he was unsure which side to fight for but ultimately decided to fight with the Ottoman Empire against the Greeks. By 28 April 1897, he made up his mind to fight on the side of the Ottomans and asked his mother to send money to the Ottoman bank. However, Churchill feared the Balkan War would be over too soon for him to get involved. According to Churchill biographer Bechhofer Roberts, Churchill met Ian Hamilton (later Sir General Ian Hamilton) on the transfer boat, and while Hamilton had promised his service to Greece, Churchill had promised his to Turkey. While Churchill’s peculiar allegiance to Turkey largely owes to his lust for glory, an additional explanation might be that he inherited a ‘Turkophile’ attitude from his father. However, Roberts dismissed such connections, arguing that ‘subalterns are often Turkophile’ and he noted that the two men shared little love for one another on the boat ride due to their conflicting alliances.  Interestingly, Churchill himself recalled the incident years later, saying that Hamilton was a ‘romantic’ and was thus ‘for the Greeks,’ while Churchill ‘having been brought up a Tory… was for the Turks.’  However, their formal confrontation was not to be, for by the time they reached their port of call at Port Said in Egypt, the war was over. Churchill lamented his lost adventure in a letter to his mother in late May 1897: ‘I have reluctantly had to give up all hopes of Turkey as the war has fizzled out  like a damp firework.’


You say that Churchill’s  curious fascination with Islamic Culture even become obvious to others around him. You give an example his sister in law’s letter. “Please don’t converted to Islam. I have noticed in your disposition a tendency to Orientalism…” Do you think this tendency was temporary?

I think Churchill had a lifelong fascination with ‘the east’ and the orient. This can be seen in his early relations with the Ottoman Empire and the fact that he vacationed in Egypt in the early 1900s. This can be seen in his later life in his frequent visits to Morocco. He often painted market bizarre and the Atlas Mountains and famously called morocco the Paris of Africa. 

However, I don’t think there was any real chance of Churchill converting to Islam. He was already, more or less, an atheist when he sister in law wrote the letter. But I do think the letter highlights a part of Churchill’s persona  which is often over looked today

 Was Churchill's tendency to İslamic culture used by his political rivals against him ?

Occasionally Churchill did get grief from the press on this topic. There 
are several political cartoons which depict him as an Arab Bedouin or as 
a sultan. In the 1920s some papers were fearful that Churchill would rule the Colonial office
 'on an oriental scale.'  They also said his special imaginative gifts made him all the more susceptible to the “seductions of the Orient”


Winston Churchill was well-known figure in Turkey. As the world entered the war, did he consider to open war against Ottoman Empire?

Churchill originally sought to keep the Ottoman Empire as an ally as early as 1911, when he was approached by Djavid Bey to see if an alliance was possible. This was dismissed by Sir Edward Grey. Later as the pieces were falling into place regarding the First World War, Churchill tried to keep the Ottoman Empire neutral, even after he requisitioned the two ships which the Ottomans had bought from the British Empire. However, he was unsuccessful and Enver Pasha and others in the CUP who supported the German alliance had already solidified German/Ottoman relations.



Some Turkish nationalist historians says, In a parlament speech Churchill told deputies that they could use chemical weapon against Turks, because Turks were not human! Can it be true? According to Churchill , Turkish people was major enemy? ( I ask this question to Martin Gilbert in a e-mail corresponce, he wrote that This claim was not true. He respected Turks due to Gallipoli Campaign, even he thought to come to Turkey in 30’s to meet Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, Founder of the Modern Turkey. But because of political crisisis in Britain , this visiting did not realise. )

Martin Gilbert is certainly correct in this. Churchill had a long history of support for Turkey and the Turkish people with the exception of the First World War, when a state of war existed. Churchill did advocate using mustard gas against the Turkish armies in a departmental memo but this was a common weapon in those days and as a I said a state of war existed but in any case the gas was not deployed in the end.  

Moreover, As martin Gilbert pointed out Churchill continued on with a very   positive view of Turkey after the war and his views are best summed up in a letter her wrote to president Inonu in 1943. Churchill said:

     There is a long story of the friendly rela­tions between Great Britain and Turkey. Across it is a ter­ri­ble slash of the last war, when Ger­man intrigues and British and Turk­ish mis­takes led to our being on oppo­site sides. We fought as brave and hon­ourable oppo­nents. But those days are done, and we…are pre­pared to make vig­or­ous exer­tions in order that we shall all be together…to move for­ward into a world arrange­ment in which peace­ful peo­ples will have a right to be let alone and in which all peo­ples will have a chance to help one another.


When We look at the process in which British parlament has considered a new campaign, Churchill as a first lord of admirality , strongly supported an attack Turkey. Why he conducted such a tough policy against Turkey?

Churchill believed if he could use the navy to force the straits in the First World War, that the bro-British leaders of the CUP might organize a coup against Enver and the German supporters. Thus effectively taking the Ottoman Empire out of the war and releaving pressure on the Western front for Britain and its allies. HE thought it was worth the risk to try and end the war as quickly as possible.


His main aim was to occupy Istanbul , to topple Sublime Porte. I found quite interesting. It is quite a race diplomatically against Russia and France. Do you agree with this view?

            There has always been an imperial competition between in Asia between Russia and the British Empire. For Churchill’s part, he originally hoped the Ottomans Empire would survive the war and would remain an ally against Russia. This of course changed when Russia collapsed. This competitive spirit certainly remained between France and Britain, especially in the former Ottoman territories in the Middle East.   


Many historians accused Churchill of defeating Gallipoli. They claimed his bad strategy to knock out Turkey did not work and caused enormours casualities .   Do you think that He was the main person who was responsible for failure at Gallipoli?

This is a difficult question. He was certainly a major architect of the Gallipoli and Dardanelles campaign.  However, there were so many other factors such as Kitchener’s promise of troops and then refusal and then ultimately agreeing to send troops, combined with poor intelligence from his admirals at the battle and all the complexities of running an amphibious assault with the British navy and British army who had never really worked in concert together, that it is impossible to comment at which point the plan really broke down.        


What was the importance of Gallipoli in his carrier? Seriously affected him? Also his failure has been used by political rivals?

It was huge moment in his career. He knew incredible failure in a way he had never known. He resigned his position and actually went to fight on the Western Front. It is even more remarkable that he was able to return to politics afterward as this sort of thing would have ended most people's careers.


What was the Churchill’s suggestions on Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and Republic of Turkey?

Churchill had pro­found admi­ra­tion for Kemal Atatürk. In 1938 Churcill wrote, that Ataurk was “the only Dic­ta­tor with an aure­ole of mar­tial achieve­ment,” He also said: “The tears which men and women of all classes shed upon his bier were a fit­ting trib­ute to the life work of a man at once the hero, the cham­pion, and the father of mod­ern Turkey. Dur­ing his long dic­ta­tor­ship a pol­icy of admirable restraint and good­will cre­ated, for the first time in his­tory, most friendly rela­tions with Greece.”


Thank you very much for your answers.




  8918 defa Görüntülendi.


Tüm yazı, yorum ve içerikten imza sahiplerinin kendileri sorumludur. Yayımlanmış olmaları, bu görüşleri Tuncay Yılmazer'in benimsediği anlamına gelmez. Yorum bölümü özgür bir tartışma ortamı yaratmak için vardır. Ancak saldırgan ve düzeysiz yorumlar yayınlanmayacaktır. Eğer bu siteye ilk kez yorum yazıyorsanız, yorum kurallarına gözatmanızı istirham ederiz.


Makaleye Yorum Ekle



5158_Muzaffer Albayrak 19-02-2015, 09:28:32
Site moderatöründen bir talep
Sitenizin Türkçe yayın yapan bir versiyonunu görmek istiyoruz.
Yabancı dil bilmeyenleri de düşünmenizi ve derginizin zengin muhteviyatından mahrum edilmemelerini rica ve talep ediyoruz.
5533_Michael D. Robson 01-03-2015, 16:09:02

Thank you for the chance to read the interesting interview.
May I add the following documents which should help to expand on Dr. Dockter's answer.

Seeking to keep Ottoman Turkey from entering the war Churchill telegraphed to Enver Pasher on 15th August 1914 and, wishing to give his message the maximum impact in Constantinople, Churchill first sent it to Grey's private secretary at the British Foreign Office with instructions for its special delivery personally to Enver.
“15 August 1914 – Admiralty
Sir William Tyrrell,
I suggest this sh(oul)d be ciphered to the Embassy at C(onstantino)ple & taken by Admiral Limpus direct to Enver thus making it a personal message from me & different from the regular diplomatic communications.”

Churchill to Enver - quote
“I hope you are not going to make a mistake wh(ich) will undo all the services you have rendered Turkey & cast away the successes of the second Balkan War. By a strict & honest neutrality these can be kept secure. But siding with Germany openly or secretly now must mean the greatest disaster to you, your comrades & your country. [see note 1 below] The overwhelming superiority at sea possessed by the navies of England, France, Russia & Japan over those of Austria & Germany renders it easy for the 4 allies to transport troops in almost unlimited numbers from any quarter of the globe & if they were forced into a quarrel by Turkey their blow could be delivered at the heart.

On the other hand I know that Sir Edward Grey who has already been approached as to possible terms of peace if Germany & Austria are beaten, has stated that if Turkey remains loyal to her neutrality, a solemn agreement to respect the integrity of the Turkish Empire must be a condition of any terms of peace that effect the near East. [see note 2 below]

The personal regard I have for you, Talaat & Djavid and the admiration with which I have followed your career from our first meeting at Wurzburg [see note 3 below] alone leads me to speak these words of friendship before it is too late.

Winston S. Churchill.”

1 – Unknown to the British, Turkey had already signed a secret alliance with Germany on 2 August 1914.
2 – The whole of this paragraph was drafted by Sir Edward Grey
3 – Churchill had met Enver at German Military manoeuvres in Wurzburg in 1909. They met again in London in 1910. In 1911 Churchill met Talaat and Djavid in Constantinople.

On 18th August 1914, the British Ambassador at Constantinople, Sir Louis Mallet, telegraphed Grey to tell him “Minister of War (Enver) is delighted with Mr Churchill's message, and told Admiral Limpus that he realised force of his arguments, and should answer it.”
Mallet sent Grey another telegram later that same day with more details:
“18 August 1914 – Constantinople
As reported in my telegram No.557 Minister of War was very much pleased with First Lord's message. He said revision of public feeling here would be effected immediately if His Majesty's Government would authorise me to make an announcement at once that the seizure of Turkish ships was not permanent, that it had been a much regretted necessity of war, that full value and some indemnity would be lodged for the ships and that public promise would be given that they would be restored in good order as soon as possible and seen safely into Turkish waters.”

There were later that day, further telegrams from Mallet to Grey, after the ambassador had met with the Turkish Minister of Marine, Ahmed Djemal, who was 'heart-broken at the loss of his ships.'

So the next day Churchill again sent a personal message to Enver and as before, Churchill asked that Rear-Admiral Limpus deliver the message in person: he also requested Limpus to inform Djemal
“19 August 1914 – Admiralty
Will you please take an opportunity of showing Minister of Marine the telegram I have sent to Enver Pasha & telling H(is) E(xcellency) that had I had the pleasure of his acquaintance I should have addressed myself directly to him.”

Churchill to Enver – quote:
“19 August 1914 – Admiralty
I deeply regretted necessity for detaining Turkish ships because I knew the patriotism with which the money had been raised all over Turkey. As a soldier you know what military necessity compels in war. I am willing to propose to His Majesty's Government the following arrangement:-
[1] both ships to be delivered to Turkey at the end of the war after being thoroughly repaired at our expense in British Dockyards;
[2] if either is sunk we will pay the full value to Turkey immediately on the declaration of peace;
[3] we will also pay at once the actual extra expense caused to Turkey by sending out crews and other incidentals as determined by an arbitrator;
[4] as a compensation to Turkey for the delay in getting the ships we will pay £1000 a day in weekly instalments for every day we keep them, dating retroactively from when we took them over.
This arrangement will come into force on the day when the last German officer and man belonging to the Goeben and Breslau shall have left Turkish territory definitely and finally, and will continue binding so long as Turkey maintains a loyal and impartial neutrality in this war and favours neither one side nor the other.
Do you agree?”

These details are from Winston Churchill By Martin Gilbert, Volume III, Companion Part I, Documents July 1914- April 1915 first published 1972

with best regards
Michael D Robson


12/12/2017 - 19:43 On the Occasion of 100. anniversary of the end of the Ottoman Rule in Jerusalem, An Exclusive Interview with Roberto Mazza, The Author of “Jerusalem: From the Ottomans to the British” (I.B.Taurus 2009)

02/10/2017 - 12:28 A Review from the other Side of the Hill: Churchill and the Dardanelles by Christopher Bell (Yusuf Ali Özkan)

06/06/2017 - 06:06 A Notebook-A Distant Memory From Gallipoli - Turkish Officers attending Anzac Day in New Zealand ( Haluk Oral)

23/02/2017 - 06:43 General Patton - Gallipoli A Staff Study (Lt.Gen. Ben Hodges)

25/01/2017 - 20:23 The Bloody Handkerchief (Ömer Arslan)

19/08/2016 - 13:21 To Halil İnalcık (Ali Yaycıoğlu)

24/06/2016 - 05:52 Gallipoli Campaign: A Symbolic Battleground (Özgür Öztürk)

05/03/2016 - 12:46 The French Battleship Bouvet was sunk by the Ottoman Artillery not sunk by the Mines, Turkish History Magazine #tarih claims

23/08/2015 - 05:28 How did the Ottomans really enter WWI? ( Emre Kızılkaya )

05/06/2015 - 03:56 Tremors of WWI still felt in Middle East today, Interview with Author of The Fall of the Ottomans, Prof. Eugene Rogan (William Armstrong)

20/05/2015 - 03:46 Major Halis Ataksor, A Turkish Officer on Arıburnu Front -Gallipoli (S.Serdar Halis Ataksor)

02/05/2015 - 02:38 The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East—1914-1920 -Eugene Rogan ( William Armstrong )

25/04/2015 - 10:26 Before I am accused of being a-Denialist An appeal to Historians who recognize the 1915-Incidents as a Genocide (Tuncay Yılmazer )

23/03/2015 - 18:25 Two Trenches,One Letter - A Gallipoli Project (Celal Yıldırım, Hatice Solmuş TED Mersin Koleji )

18/02/2015 - 15:44 Winston Churchill, Islamic World, Middle East, Turks, Gallipoli and Atatürk - An Exclusive Interview with Cambridge University Historian Dr. Warren Dockter ( Tuncay Yılmazer )

12/01/2015 - 06:45 “What is different in my approach is to concentrate on a small geographical area of Gallipoli” An exclusive interview with Gallipoli Campaign Researcher Stephen Chambers ( M. Onur Yurdal-Tuncay Yılmazer)

11/01/2015 - 14:38 A Condemnation from Gelibolu'yu Anlamak

06/01/2015 - 02:30 Savaş Alanları-Gallipoli Battlefield photographs taken from the air ( Gökhan T. Karaman )

22/11/2014 - 12:37 Voices Of Gallipoli kitabının Türkçe Versiyonunun tanıtımının ve Dr. Ian McGibbon’un Sunumundan İzlenimler (M. Onur Yurdal)

29/09/2014 - 20:08 Gallipoli Constructions Are Continuing , The History and The Environment are Getting Lost ( Tuncay Yılmazer )

17/11/2013 - 15:11 Gallipoli campaign was a disastrous mistake from start to finish – An Exclusive Interview with a leading Military Historian Peter Hart ( M. Onur Yurdal )